-
Authors: Clémentine Cottineau
Mean reproducibility score:
8.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
1
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
This article was meant to be entirely reproducible, with the data and code published alongside the article. It is however not embedded within a container (e.g. Docker). Will it past the reproducibility test tomorrow? next year? I'm curious.
-
Authors: Robert A. Smith, Paul P. Schneider, Alice Bullas, Steve Haake, Helen Quirk, Rami Cosulich1, Elizabeth Goyder
Mean reproducibility score:
9.2/10
|
Number of reviews:
5
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
The code and data are both on GitHub. The paper has been published in Wellcome Open Research and has been replicated by multiple other authors.
-
Authors: Atsushi Ebihara, Joel H. Nitta, Yurika Matsumoto, Yuri Fukazawa, Marie Kurihara, Hitomi Yokote, Kaoru Sakuma, Otowa Azakami, Yumiko Hirayama, Ryoko Imaichi
Mean reproducibility score:
10.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
1
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
It uses the drake R package that should make reproducibility of R projects much easier (just run make.R and you're done). However, it does depend on very specific package versions, which are provided by the accompanying docker image.