-
Authors: Robert A. Smith, Paul P. Schneider, Alice Bullas, Steve Haake, Helen Quirk, Rami Cosulich1, Elizabeth Goyder
Mean reproducibility score:
9.2/10
|
Number of reviews:
5
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
The code and data are both on GitHub. The paper has been published in Wellcome Open Research and has been replicated by multiple other authors.
-
Authors: Sahil Loomba, Alexandre de Figueiredo, Simon J. Piatek, Kristen de Graaf, Heidi J. Larson
Mean reproducibility score:
7.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
4
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
In the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper provided important evidence regarding the effect of misinformation on vaccination intent. Its analyses and conclusions were extremely important for decision makers. Therefore, it is also important that the analyses are reproducible.
-
Authors: Atsushi Ebihara, Joel H. Nitta, Yurika Matsumoto, Yuri Fukazawa, Marie Kurihara, Hitomi Yokote, Kaoru Sakuma, Otowa Azakami, Yumiko Hirayama, Ryoko Imaichi
Mean reproducibility score:
10.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
1
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
It uses the drake R package that should make reproducibility of R projects much easier (just run make.R and you're done). However, it does depend on very specific package versions, which are provided by the accompanying docker image.