This is a seminal paper on reproducibility in cancer biology. It should be a gold standard for reproducible research work. Therefore, it should be attempted to reproduce it. Supposedly, this will be pretty easy to reproduce and can be used as a *positive control* in repro hacks!
This article used an open-source python repository for its analysis. It is well-suited for reproduction as more literature evolves on the intersection of urban planning and climate change. The adapted code is published alongside the article.
This article was meant to be entirely reproducible, with the data and code published alongside the article. It is however not embedded within a container (e.g. Docker). Will it past the reproducibility test tomorrow? next year? I'm curious.