-
Authors: Angela I. Renton, Thuy T. Dao, Tom Johnstone, Oren Civier, Ryan P. Sullivan, David J. White, Paris Lyons, Benjamin M. Slade, David F. Abbott, Toluwani J. Amos, Saskia Bollmann, Andy Botting, Megan E. J. Campbell, Jeryn Chang, Thomas G. Close, Monika Dörig, Korbinian Eckstein, Gary F. Egan, Stefanie Evas, Guillaume Flandin, Kelly G. Garner, Marta I. Garrido, Satrajit S. Ghosh, Martin Grignard, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Anthony J. Hannan, Anibal S. Heinsfeld, Laurentius Huber, Matthew E. Hughes, Jakub R. Kaczmarzyk, Lars Kasper, Levin Kuhlmann, Kexin Lou, Yorguin-Jose Mantilla-Ramos, Jason B. Mattingley, Michael L. Meier, Jo Morris, Akshaiy Narayanan, Franco Pestilli, Aina Puce, Fernanda L. Ribeiro, Nigel C. Rogasch, Chris Rorden, Mark M. Schira, Thomas B. Shaw, Paul F. Sowman, Gershon Spitz, Ashley W. Stewart, Xincheng Ye, Judy D. Zhu, Aswin Narayanan & Steffen Bollmann
Mean reproducibility score:
2.5/10
|
Number of reviews:
2
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
We invested a lot of work to make the analyses from the paper reproducible and we are very curious how the documentation could be improved and if people run into any problems.
-
Authors: Romain Caneill
Fabien Roquet
Gurvan Madec
Jonas Nycander
Mean reproducibility score:
0.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
1
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
I tried hard to make it reproducible, so hopefully this paper can serve as an example on how reproducibility can be achieved.
I think that being reproducible with only few commands to type in a terminal is quite an achievment. At least in my field, where I usually see code published along with paper, but with almost no documentation on how to rerun it.
-
Authors: Sander van Rijn, Sebastian Schmitt, Matthijs van Leeuwen, Thomas Bäck
Mean reproducibility score:
9.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
1
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
Because:
- Two fellow PhDs working on different topics have been able to reproduce some figures by following the README instructions and I hope this extends to other people
- I've tried to incorporate as many of the best practices as possible to make my code and data open and accessible
- I've tried to make sure that my data is exactly reproducible with the specified random seed strategy
- the paper suggests a method that should be useful to other researchers in my field, which is not useful unless my results are reproducible
-
Authors: Sander van Rijn, Hao Wang, Bas van Stein, Thomas Bäck
Mean reproducibility score:
10.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
1
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
The original data took quite a while to produce for a previous paper, but for this paper, all tables and figures should be exactly reproducible by simply running the jupyter notebook.