Papers



Submit a Paper!

Browse ReproHack papers

  • Tree regeneration in models of forest dynamics: A key priority for further research

    Authors: Olalla Díaz‐Yáñez; Yannek Käber; Tim Anders; Friedrich Bohn; Kristin H. Braziunas; Josef Brůna; Rico Fischer; Samuel M. Fischer; Jessica Hetzer; Thomas Hickler et al.
    DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.4807
    Submitted by odiazyanez    
    Number of reviews:   1
    Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?

    This paper is fully reproducible; we provide the protocol that the different modelers used, the data produced from these models, the observed data, and the code to run the analysis that led to the results of the paper, figures, and text. I have not come across any other paper in forestry that is as fully reproducible as our paper, so it might also be a rare example in this field and hopefully a motivation to others to do so. Please notice that we do not provide the models that were used to run the simulations, as these are the results used (or data collection), but we do provide the data resulting from these simulations.

  • Optimizing the Use of Carbonate Standards to Minimize Uncertainties in Clumped Isotope Data

    Authors: Ilja J. Kocken, Inigo A. Müller, Martin Ziegler
    DOI: 10.1029/2019GC008545
    Submitted by japhir      

    Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?

    Even though the approach in the paper focuses on a specific measurement (clumped isotopes) and how to optimize which and how many standards we use, I hope that the problem is general enough that insight can translate to any kind of measurement that relies on machine calibration. I've committed to writing a literate program (plain text interspersed with code chunks) to explain what is going on and to make the simulations one step at a time. I really hope that this is understandable to future collaborators and scientists in my field, but I have not had any code review internally and I also didn't receive any feedback on it from the reviewers. I would love to see if what in my mind represents "reproducible code" is actually reproducible, and to learn what I can improve for future projects!

  • Where should new parkrun events be located? Modelling the potential impact of 200 new events on socio-economic inequalities in access and participation

    Authors: Schneider PP, Smith RA, Bullas AM, Bayley T, Haake SS, Brennan A, Goyder E
    Submitted by hub-admin    
      Mean reproducibility score:   7.0/10   |   Number of reviews:   3
    Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?

    If all went right, the analysis should be fully reproducible without the need to make any adjustments. The paper aims to find optimal locations for new parkruns, but we were not 100% sure how 'optimal' should be defined. We provide a few examples, but the code was meant to be flexible enough to allow potential decision makers to specify their own, alternative objectives. The spatial data set is also quite interesting and fun to play around with. Cave: The full analysis takes a while to run (~30+ min) and might require >= 8gb ram.

  • Spatial modelling of rice yield losses in Tanzania due to bacterial leaf blight and leaf blast in a changing climate

    Authors: C. Duku, A. H. Sparks, S. J. Zwart.
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1580-2
    Submitted by hub-admin    
      Mean reproducibility score:   4.0/10   |   Number of reviews:   2
    Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?

    This was my third attempt at making a paper fully reproducible. To date I it's the most reproducible that I have published. I'm interested to know what stumbling blocks exist that I'm not aware of (aside from needing software like ArcGIS to fully rerun the complete analysis).

    Tags: Python R ArcGIS

Search for papers

Filter by tags

Python R ArcGIS make Docker Drake Shiny LaTeX SVN knitr HPC Computer Science C Matlab Mathematica Stata Meta-analysis GDAL GEOS GIS PROJ Social Science swig miniconda neuroscience Jupyter Notebook tensorflow keras Pandas SQL Galaxies Astronomy Databases Binder tidyverse emacs literate earth sciences clumped isotopes org-mode geology eyetracking Git robotics deep learning planner reiforcement learning Plasma physics Hybrid-PIC EPOCH Laser Gamma-ray X-ray radiation Petawatt Fortran plasma PIC physics Monte Carlo Atomistic Simulation LAMMPS Electron Transport DFT descriptors interatomic potentials machine learning Molecular Dynamics Python scripting AIRSS structure prediction density functional theory high-throughput machine-learning RNA bioinformatics CFD Fluid Dynamics OpenFOAM C++ DNS Mathematics Droplets Basilisk Particle-In-Cell psychology consumer behavior number estimation mental arithmetic psychophysics Stan Finance SAS Replication crisis Economics Malaria Archaeology Precipitation Epidemiology Parkrun Health Health Economics HTA plumber science of science Zipf networks city size distribution urbanism literature review Preference Visual Questionnaire Mann-Whitney Correlation Conceptual replication Cognitive psychology Multinomial processing tree (MPT) modeling #urbanism #R k-means cluster analysis city-regions Urban Knowledge Systems Topic modelling Planning Support Systems Software Citation Quarto snakemake Numerical modelling Ocean climate physical oceanography apptainer oceanography R package structural equation modeling bayes factor Forest Simulations Models of forest dynamics multi-lab study mice mechanics growth Tissue Cells Clustering Expectation-Maximization bootstrapping R software Position Weight Matrices singularity neuroimaging effect size biology replicability cancer reproducibility csv osf preclinical research All tags Clear tags

Key

  Associated with an event
  Available for general review
  Public reviews welcome