Using mice from different breeding sites fails to improve replicability of results from single-laboratory studies



  Paper is only available for review at the ReproHack at the Swiss Reproducibility Conference 2024 event  

Submitted by bernhard.voelkl@unibe.ch

May 22, 2024, 3:02 p.m.

Using mice from different breeding sites fails to improve replicability of results from single-laboratory studies

Ivana Jaric, Bernhard Voelkl, Irmgard Amrein, David P Wolfer, Janja Novak, Carlotta Detotto, Ulrike Weber-Stadlbauer, Urs Meyer, Francesca Manuella, Isabelle M Mansuy, Hanno Würbel
Jaric, I., Voelkl, B., Amrein, I., Wolfer, D. P., Novak, J., Detotto, C., ... & Würbel, H. (2024). Using mice from different breeding sites fails to improve replicability of results from single-laboratory studies. Lab animal, 53(1), 18-22.
DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-023-01307-w        

Brief Description
Here we report a multi-laboratory study aimed at investigating whether heterogenization of study populations by using animals from different breeding sites increases the replicability of results from single-laboratory studies. We used male C57BL/6J mice from six different breeding sites to test a standardized against a heterogenized (HET) study design in six independent replicate test laboratories. For the standardized design, each laboratory ordered mice from a single breeding site (each laboratory from a different one), while for the HET design, each laboratory ordered proportionate numbers of mice from the five remaining breeding sites. To test our hypothesis, we assessed 14 outcome variables, including body weight, behavioral measures obtained from a single session on an elevated plus maze, and clinical blood parameters.

Data and an R script with all analyses are available as supplementary material on the publisher's website.
Why should we reproduce your paper?
This is an example of a study with an analysis going beyond a simple t-test; yet the entire analysis is based on one comprehensive and manageable data set privided with the publication.
What should reviewers focus on?

Resources


Associated event